| · Portal |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| This menu has been disabled |
| Today's Top 10 Posters · My Last 10 Posts | Board and IRC Rules · Help · Members · Calendar |
| Pages: (14) « First ... 12 13 [14] ( Go to first unread post ) |    |
Battlemasters (general discussion thread), Status: progressing
| kalan_vod |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 12:11
|
||
|
Unregistered  |
Edited: bold is newer. |
||
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 13:20
|
|
Unregistered |
thx Kalan! *Spellshaper huggles!
Got it to work this time... and it´s faster! *Spellshaper huggles again! |
|
|
| kalan_vod |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 13:22
|
|
Unregistered |
Hehe, np..How much was saved as of now?
|
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 13:39
|
|
Unregistered |
740-642=98 bytes saved!
(the bugged version compiled by sourcecoder saved ~200 bytes... but as said, not usable ^^) /edit: one thing: If (Z≠0) is not If not(Z  This post has been edited by Spellshaper on 3 Apr, 2006, 13:40 |
|
|
| kalan_vod |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 14:42
|
|
Unregistered |
Oops, I guess I skimed through it too fast
 . |
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 3 Apr, 2006, 14:47
|
|
Unregistered |
np... I figured it out after walking around for about 5min...
(the Z states if the mappart has creeps or not, R is the probability to encounter a creep on the next step) |
|
|
| xlibman |
Posted: 5 Apr, 2006, 13:07
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
I tried it its very cool so far keep up the good work. ^^
|
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 5 Apr, 2006, 15:33
|
|
Unregistered |
no mayor updates... but got sum parts of the battle engine to work... though still buggy
*Spellshaper has to get some bug spray soon /edit: someone revive the association and counting thread ^^ This post has been edited by Spellshaper on 5 Apr, 2006, 15:39 |
|
|
| Ranman |
Posted: 6 Apr, 2006, 7:42
|
|
Unregistered |
Can you say the Battlemasters has gained in percentage complete?
|
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 6 Apr, 2006, 9:19
|
|
Unregistered |
maybe 2%
^^ |
|
|
| Ranman |
Posted: 6 Apr, 2006, 9:56
|
||
|
Unregistered |
Woo hoo  Good job  |
||
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 6 Apr, 2006, 10:41
|
|
Unregistered |
lol^^
|
|
|
| Spellshaper |
Posted: 7 Apr, 2006, 16:01
|
|
Unregistered |
Hm... I´m thinking about getting rid of the extra "wait-bar" in battles...
Current battle system is like this: Every creep and the player has an attack bar, which is divided into a "progress" and "wait" part. After the "progress" is filled, the AI/player decides the action and stores it, then the "wait" bar starts loading. Only after the wait bar has fully loaded is the attack being performed. Downside: Needs complicated code and is probably slow(er) Upside: Adds variety. For example, if the creep is in the "wait" status while the player hits it, the attack could do extra dmg or kinda stun the creep (lower attack bar increase or lessen the value of progress for the creep upon being hit) What do you think? |
|
|
| xlibman |
Posted: 7 Apr, 2006, 18:08
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
aaah I see, that will still be cool i think. I remember in final fantasy 9 whe you chosen an attack it would take a long while before you can attack, but the problem is that most of the time the enemy could attack 3 or 4 times before you can even attack so you eventually died
|
|
|
 Pages: (14) « First ... 12 13 [14] |
|
Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.5715 seconds | Archive
Page creation time: 0.5715 seconds | Archive
Skin by xlibman and Jc
All programs and games are property of their respective owners.