
| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| This menu has been disabled |
| Today's Top 10 Posters · My Last 10 Posts | Board and IRC Rules · Help · Members · Calendar |
| Pages: (12) 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| xlibman |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:09
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
yeah in basic maps size are quite a problem unless you store them in pics, but in pics they are limited
|
| tenniskid493 |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:23
|
|
Unregistered |
I agree with that. In my project right now, over half the memory is maps. I use a program that is archived for each map and then use FG (I will use xLib when it comes out) to run it. All the program does is define a matrix. Each one is about 500-1000 bytes.
|
|
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:30
|
|
Unregistered |
true, the map size, there is also a matrix in the memory while this is going, but oh well
|
|
|
| xlibman |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:44
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
unfortunately we have to deal with this
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:46
|
|
Unregistered |
I hope so, the next engine will be three rooms to do a moving from area to area. Look for this soon
|
|
|
| Ranman |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 19:58
|
|
Unregistered |
I guess I am going to have to get a Z80 calc so I try these things out.
Any recommendations as to which one? |
|
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 20:08
|
|
Unregistered |
84+SE if you can
|
|
|
| dragon__lance |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 20:54
|
||
|
Unregistered |
i say 83+ SE , atleast i think its better. anyways, my personal recommendation is a ti 83+. that way if u program it, u kno the slowest the prgm will go |
||
|
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 21:02
|
|
Unregistered |
true, I am doing this all on an 84+SE. The reason I recommended it is that it has the most memory of a calc that you can easily find
|
|
|
| xlibman |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 21:33
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
if only the 83+SE was still sold
|
| tenniskid493 |
Posted: 10 Dec, 2005, 22:39
|
|
Unregistered |
Yea..they're sweet. I have one.
Why'd they stop selling them. |
|
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 11 Dec, 2005, 12:44
|
|
Unregistered |
because the 84+SE was identical to the 83+SE really. TI thought it was bad for competing calcs
|
|
|
| xlibman |
Posted: 11 Dec, 2005, 18:28
|
|
Group: Founder Posts: 12 Member No.: 1 Joined: 8 Sep, 2004 |
not making the new calcs compatible with old serial cables was even worse
|
| rivereye |
Posted: 12 Dec, 2005, 9:51
|
|
Unregistered |
that too. Next step is to work on a menu option for the RPG, shouldn't take too much. Is there anyone testing this on an 83+ (not a silver or 84+)?
|
|
|
| tenniskid493 |
Posted: 12 Dec, 2005, 10:02
|
|
Unregistered |
I tried the walking engine one on my 83+
|
|
|
Pages: (12) 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... Last » |
![]() ![]() ![]() |