View Full Version: Al Gore on cigarette smoking:

Capitalist Paradise > The Night Watchman > Al Gore on cigarette smoking:


Title: Al Gore on cigarette smoking:
Description: It causes global warming


Inspector - October 4, 2006 11:51 AM (GMT)
Via Gus Van Horn, I learned that Al Gore considers cigarette smoking to be "a 'significant' contributor to global warming."

Actually, Gus already says everything I would have on this matter.

QUOTE ('Gus Van Horn')
But what did al-Gore smoke?

This morning's top Drudge Report headline: "Cigarette Smoking 'Significant Contributor' to Global Warming". Drudge links to one of those transient "flash" links he sometimes uses and it isn't even for the right story.

But I did find this.

Wow.

Greenland, he also says, is going to split in two.

Please, Al. Do tell us more. Make sure anyone with a grain of sense knows you're a crackpot. Maybe they'll decide to look into the "science" behind global warming a bit more deeply.

Thanks. (That was said in Bill Lumbergh's voice.)


I'd just like to add that Gore's continued existence on the political landscape is a sort of reverse-canary-in-the-mineshaft indicator of just how far gone the political left is. If reason was even a faint part of their worldview, they would have thrown a wack-job like him out years ago.

Probably the instant he grew that beard.

-Inspector

AntiSocialist - October 4, 2006 10:31 PM (GMT)
Perhaps we should use his scaremongering statements to tell people about just how ridiculous the left is today. The fact is, and socialists like to ignore it due to fear of members of their movement, that "environmentalism" is nothing more than destroying our freedoms. Of course, giving the "environmentalists" powers which laws these days are doing, they would care little or nothing for the environment.

Strangely enough, the best thing that has happened to the environment in recent history is the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Inspector - October 5, 2006 03:40 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (AntiSocialist @ Oct 4 2006, 04:31 PM)
Of course, giving the "environmentalists" powers which laws these days are doing, they would care little or nothing for the environment.

Good point, especially considering that "The Environment," as it is imagined by Environmentalists, does not exist. Ecological systems are never in a total state of "balance;" things are always evolving, changing, and going extinct. The idea that things, as they are at an arbitrarily chosen point in time, are "sacred," and that any action of ours to change them from that state, is the premise that they're working on. But scientifically, it is ridiculous on its face.

Michael Crichton makes this point well; their idea of "The Environment" is closer to the mythical Garden of Eden than any actual biome.

Inquisitor - October 5, 2006 09:08 PM (GMT)
Since when did reality enter into the picture?

These people work from a mythical model with everything they do. And it is their M.O. to just add whatever catches their eye to the cause of the sky falling. If they aren't trying to hamper you with chicken little logic then they are hammering you with completely ridicules legislation about things NOBODY gives a crap about. Example

My point is that Viros have no more grasp on reality then the fly sitting on a pile of poop.

AntiSocialist - October 5, 2006 10:09 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Inquisitor @ Oct 5 2006, 09:08 PM)
Since when did reality enter into the picture?

These people work from a mythical model with everything they do. And it is their M.O. to just add whatever catches their eye to the cause of the sky falling. If they aren't trying to hamper you with chicken little logic then they are hammering you with completely ridicules legislation about things NOBODY gives a crap about. Example

My point is that Viros have no more grasp on reality then the fly sitting on a pile of poop.

It really does show you where the left's priorities are. Rather than tending to their duties, they'd rather sit around all day disclaiming responsibility for errors.

Inspector - October 6, 2006 08:24 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Inquisitor @ Oct 5 2006, 03:08 PM)
Example

Okay, this begs comment:

QUOTE
"Anybody who's traveled anywhere in this country knows that people are just laughing their heads off at us....It has become an embarrassment," Stone said.

"From this point on, we're not going to be taken seriously on anything we do because of what may have been a very well-intentioned ordinance that may have been correct in principle but has placed us in a terrible light."


Oh, so the foie gras ban was "correct in principle" but it makes people laugh at them. And that's why they're repealing it?

That's even more evil than the "thinking" responsible for the ban in the first place.

Oh but this guy is super-awesome, and I'd go eat at his restaurant just to meet him in person, if I still lived in Chicago:

QUOTE
Block 44 chef Rick Spiros acknowledged that he served "about eight orders" of foie gras even though he knew the liver delicacy was illegal.

On Monday, Spiros said: "I'm a hard-working chef. To have these bleeding-heart liberals cry about an ----- duck is ridiculous. This is a food chain. Be happy you're on top of that food chain. You could easily be on the bottom.''


Also I love how people are eating it just to defy the ban. Chicagoans are many things, but food pansies they are not. Having now lived in other parts of the country, I can tell you that we Chicago natives are set apart by our love of good food.




* Hosted for free by InvisionFree