
| · Kinetic Cipher Forum Guidelines · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| DFalcon |
Posted: Aug 20 2006, 04:01 PM
|
|
Brawling Chef Group: Members Posts: 66 Member No.: 16 Joined: 24-June 06 |
Per rule 201, Karsuman went inactive at 4:40 PM August 19 (this is in Greenwich Daylight) for failure to vote on proposal 315.
This meant that 315 was adopted, but the changes weren't entered within 24 hours. Per rule 205 Brick and I went inactive at 4:40 PM August 20, Brick, Trihan and I lose a bunch of points, the game ends, and the winner is whoever has the most points remaining: FAIF, with 39 points. That's all for this game. |
| Brickroad |
Posted: Aug 22 2006, 08:10 AM
|
|
Grandmaster Cipher Group: Administrator Posts: 151 Member No.: 1 Joined: 19-June 06 |
D'oh.
We fail at Nomic. =( I think I made it way, way too easy to go inactive. What could have been done differently? |
| DFalcon |
Posted: Aug 25 2006, 02:46 PM
|
|
Brawling Chef Group: Members Posts: 66 Member No.: 16 Joined: 24-June 06 |
Too fast, problems caused by adapting the initial ruleset for forum.
I wasn't a big fan of penalizing points for a failed proposal, at least not for the early or unanimous votes. I may look at some other online games (e.g. [url=http://blognomic.com/]) for ideas. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |