Warning & Punishment (3 Strikes)

[orioni]

In light of recent events, I propose this small set of clear role-play warnings and the appropriate punishments. You are free to comment, as long as you stay on topic. (This should not take ages.)

Moderation and administration have agreed on the following warnings and punishments regarding role-playing on this board:

1. Strike 1: Godmodding, multiing, clear racism and other behaviour deemed as 'misbehaviour' by the members in general and moderators/administrators in particular will be subject to the following warning: the member(s) will receive a clear warning by a role-play moderator (regular members have to inform a moderator of the abuse via private message, as they are no moderator).
2. Strike 2: If the initial first warning is ignored and more misbehaviour from the member(s) takes place then a three (3) day warning will be issued during which all posts on the entire forum will be presented to a moderator for review before appearing on the board.
3. Strike 3: If both the first and second warnings are ignored, the following measures will be taken by moderation/administration: one (1) full week of moderation of all posts; a ban from the role-play section for a full week as well; the senate will discuss the matter and decide if additional punishment(s) are in order.
4. Ban: If the member(s) still continue to be a pest, no further warning will be given and the member(s) is immediately banned from the board untill pigs fly.

As said: you are free to comment/add/suggest, just as long as you stay on topic.

This post has been edited by orioni on Mar 13 2006, 02:36 PM

[Upper Strathyclyde]

All for it. I am for preventing hooligans like Xheng.

[Rekamgil]

I second that motion

[orioni]

A word from the current mods would also be appreciated. *hint hint*

[Scipii]

How many warnings am I on?

[Bhalman]

I third.

[orioni]

None, Scipii. Otherwise you would have noticed something. I know we had a minor conflict some time ago (which was my mistake, because I forgot something I probably should have remembered), but I hope that's in the past now.

Let's get back on topic now. I see three people agree with the warning-system already. No suggestions have been made on how to change them, even a little. That's ok.

[Tamurin]

Excellent. This will give the mods the legal backup we need.

[Vanarambaion]

I'll go for that. Does that make mine a 'fourth' on the motion?

TagEdit: Thread split and cleaned. See this thread

This post has been edited by Tagmatium Rules on Feb 22 2006, 03:30 PM

[Pirilao]

This will function as a court, is this?

[orioni]

Tamurin has replied. Still waiting for Adaptus and Tagmatium. You guys are the RP mods, so this is your terrain. Please share your opinion and ideas.

[Adaptus]

Oh yeah, i had this on my old forum, very usefull.

[Fleet Admiral Connor Grey]

I'm for it, makes sense.

If you are actually going to set it in writing, just make sure to add, "or anything deemed similar", so you have some room to open it up. YOu never know when something may come up that is outside the bounds of this.

[orioni]

Alright, this seems to be generally accepted. I'll write a decent full text later this evening, and include some more helpfull information, such as using the "Report"-button (next to "Quote").

[orioni]

I added these rules to the board rules as well, so no one will be able to say they didn't know about it.