Create your own social network with a free forum.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Cult Tv Boards. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Battlestar Galactica ~ Doctor Who ~ Heroes ~ Lost ~ Smallville ~ Stargate Atlantis ~ Supernatural ~ Alias ~ Babylon 5 ~ Buffy the Vampire Slayer ~ Farscape ~ Firefly ~ Stargate SG1 ~ Star Trek ~ The X Files ~ 24 ~ CSI ~ Criminal Minds ~ Numb3rs ~ Without A Trace ~ Dexter ~ Law & Order ~ The Shield ~ The Wire ~ ER ~ Grey's Anatomy ~ House ~ NYPD Blue ~ The West Wing ~ and much much more
Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 Dollhouse , 1 x 01
little pixie
Posted: Feb 13 2009, 01:49 PM


Pink Mousey - Live the Dream
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 26,786
Member No.: 141
Joined: 20-February 05



QUOTE
Ghost

Original Air Date—13 February 2009


Discuss. smile.gif
Top
TV Yank
Posted: Feb 14 2009, 07:30 PM


Tiffany of Girls' Generation
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,058
Member No.: 15
Joined: 8-May 04



Ep 1.01

Good premise. Some very good scenes. Some very dull scenes. Lotsa emphasis on skin and sexiness.

The premise reminds of the holodeck on ENTERPRISE. It allowed for variations in the settings that might have been more difficult to pull off even in a scifi story. Here, it's the character that changes -- being reprogrammed to do the bidding of the client.

That should be a challenge for Eliza Dushku who never seemed able to change personas. But I thought she did pretty well in the central story as the confident, intellectual negotiator who has a hidden fear.

Whedon can't seem to leave England behind. Londoner Olivia Williams appears as the head of the corporation "Dollhouse" -- accent intact.

BTW... there's a relentless FBI agent trying to track down this mystery organization. His introduction was in one of those really dull scenes.

The promotion was extremely heavy for this show. Before and during SARAH CONNORS, Summer Glau and Eliza appeared in promos encouraging viewers to stay tuned for DOLLHOUSE immediately following. It's a good combination of shows.
Top
buffy_fan1
Posted: Feb 14 2009, 09:19 PM


I'm Under Her Spell!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 9,173
Member No.: 102
Joined: 27-January 05



I’m aware that my when taking about Joss and Eliza my objectivity goes out of the window laugh.gif so I’m just going tell you what great and then more on to talk about what was fantastic and leave it to the more sensible and intelligent members to give a balanced review.

We start with Caroline in DeWitt’s office about sign her life away and join the Dollhouse. My question is what does Caroline think she is signing up to? There is lots of talk and a five year contact and all problem solved but know mention of what’s involved that contact could said anything after all Echo won’t remember it.

When Echo returns from her engagement with Matt and ask Boyd to take back to the party he looks guilty when she tells him he’s good people. I’m look forward to see just how and why he ended up working for the Dollhouse.

It’s always good to see Amy Acker but after there was so much talk about her make up but I didn’t notice the “scars” that much to be honest.

So Miss Penn hostage negotiator that role to a little more getting used to for me as so use to her playing the kick ass tough girls but she started to panic in the face of the man she thought was her kidnapper she seemed more at home but I’m nit picking here I’m honest I still think Eliza played it well.

One thing why would the father of the kidnapped girl hire a Doll then start tell her she is a doll? As soon as Echo is under pressure she has a flashback to seeing Sierra in the chair which can only mean trouble.

I can’t understand Adelle’s logic when she almost refuses to send Echo back out on the grounds it’s bad PR wouldn’t letting the daughter of wounded client die be much worse? We see Boyd caring side again as he clear doesn’t want her to be in pain but he wants to save the Davina not just because it’s job but because it’s the right thing to do.

I like the set up for what looks to be main story arc for season 1 as Alpha sitting in a room full dead bodies looking over video of Caroline’s life as he sends her photo to Ballard.

I love this episode it did what a first should introduced all the characters and with some great action. I’m already looking forward to next week now and off it watch it again now.


Top
willowroolz
Posted: Feb 14 2009, 10:54 PM


A Lerxst in wonderland
Group Icon

Group: Special Member
Posts: 23,334
Member No.: 9
Joined: 27-April 04



I've managed to get to this point pretty much spoiler-free for the show, apart from the basic premise. I must admit I found it strangely sterile. For a Whedon project there was a distinct lack of interesting characters, wit and cohesion. The episode just didn't seem to hang together at all well, and the characters surrounding Echo were disappointing stereotypes (the geek in charge of the personas, the ex-cop who is her handler, and the FBI agent especially).

I definitely got the impression that a lot of this is down to Whedon trying to do something more mature. No witty banter or pratfalls, everyone playing it straight and barely cracking a smile. I applaud his desire to do something different, I just hope it doesn't turn round and slap him in the face. I'll certainly keep tuning in with the hope that he succeeds.

That said, there are some interesting ideas at work which will hopefully develop quickly. I'm curious to see how Whedon handles development of Echo's character. Considering she's likely to be playing a completely different person each week it could be difficult but the hints at her remembering what happened to Sierra indicate this is going to be as much about Echo uncovering what is happening to her as it is about the mission of the week.

The final couple of scenes were at least indicative that there is much more to this than meets the eye.
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 15 2009, 06:06 PM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



You watched the series premiere—but should you move into the Dollhouse for more?

article
Top
Michelle
Posted: Feb 16 2009, 09:39 AM


No more drinking on a school night
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 10,671
Member No.: 25
Joined: 24-May 04



So far so yawn.gif.

I shall stick with it for a bit though, cos it's Joss.
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 16 2009, 08:00 PM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 17 2009, 10:19 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



QUOTE
"Dollhouse" - 1x01 "Ghost" - Guardian.co.uk Review


After a long wait and a lot of talk, Friday saw the the premiere of Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse. Which was ace, if you are one of the world’s big Whedon-lovers. The creator of Buffy, Angel, Firefly/Serenity, Dr Horrible’s Singalong Blog and general all-round king geek of television was having another shot at primetime TV.

Dollhouse is a sci-fi based on the concept of a set of agents, blank canvasses of people - dolls - onto which any information, knowledge, personality or skill-set can be overlaid, in order to get a job done.

But how did it go? Well, it’s some parts Yay!, Um? and Well, lets wait and see because seriously, it’s got to get better than this, right? It’s Whedon! But then, when expectations were so high in the months - even the year - before its debut, it’s difficult to imagine how it could have been any different.

There are whole sites, like Dollverse, that have been building up to the launch seemingly forever, pointing out where to watch it legally (and perhaps illegally). There has been deconstruction, discussion and dissection on all aspects, at ultimate Joss-fansite Whedonesque. Since Dollhouse was first announced, every press release, every interview, every schedule change has been seized upon for angsty interrogation. "What might this MEAN?!" is asked of every snippet; as if it were the subject of the attentions of a teenage crush.

The whole argument seems to be that after all the refilming, tinkering and refocusing of the series to please Fox, about whom there have been doubts from fans way before it actually aired - it seems to be missing a certain Whedon-ness. The bounce and wit that people expect from one of his shows - the trademark dancing dialogue and such - seems to be missing.

Critics who have seen more than one episode say that particular element comes together more in the next few episodes. They also suggest that the Fox network’s insistence on every episode being self-contained is presumably so they can cancel it halfway through the series without caring too much (it’s what they seem to do with everything else).

For my part, I can do little more than defer to my visiting mother’s review of the pre-credit sequence - Eliza Dushku wandering a street and a club in a very short dress, then some mysterious happenings - which ran:

That woman appears to be wearing a nightie. Why is she wearing a nightie ... Oh! Now she’s wearing a different nightie! Goodness! Someone’s in a bodybag. Exposure, most likely. Well that’ll serve you right for wearing a nightie in public.

... before I had to switch over. Though I watched more later without her, I started to think that having her commentary would make it more way more fun, so I’ve decided to wait until l could persuade her to watch more, and perhaps liveblog it.

The more I looked into other people’s reactions, the more worried I felt. I want to love Dollhouse. I love Buffy; I love Firefly; I love Dr Horrible an awful lot. And while I’m not that keen on Eliza Dushku, I’ve really been looking forward to Dollhouse - and now I’m scared to watch it, in case it’s not all that.

The new Joss Whedon was always going to be an event, but one wonders if it was always going to be a bit of a letdown. When you build something up so much, the chances of it not living up to your expectations increases. Hopefully, Dollhouse can grow past that. Past the restrictions of its Friday the 13th opening, and its terrible Friday timeslot in the US, and grow into a witty, warm, Whedonesque series. Fingers crossed.

Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 17 2009, 10:39 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



QUOTE
Teevee.net

Have a Little Faith in the Dollhouse


I don’t know what Tom Shales’ problem is. The usually savvy TV critic’s review of Dollhouse, Joss Whedon’s latest round of you-hold-the-football-Charlie-Brown-and-I’ll-kick-it with the Fox Network, is so unaccountably venomous, you’d think the show ran over his dog at some point. I’m happy to report I’ve got no such problem with “Dollhouse” — except maybe with the way Fox is marketing it.

Tarting up star Eliza Dushku and fellow Whedon alum Summer Glau to do promos as pouty-lipped nerd bait, and giving them inane and insulting come-ons to read off to the sort of lonely fanboys who are home to watch TV on Friday night, is about as classy as you’d expect from Fox. It also smacks of self-fulfilling prophecy, considering “Dollhouse” is slated in the same Friday night “death slot” that did in Whedon’s Firefly — and, oh, pretty much every other Fox sci-fi show not named The X-Files or Fringe.

As with Firefly, a swift death for Dollhouse would likely be a shame, judging by the pilot. It’s not perfect, and it bears the clumsy pawprints of network meddling — having been completely rewritten and reshot, presumably to meet Fox’s demands for more sexy chicks and motorcycle chases. But on the whole, Whedon’s new series is intriguing, entertaining, and full of promise.

For those of you not connected to the geek grapevine at any time in the past six months or so, here’s the 411: Dushku plays Echo, an “Active” working for a covert agency known as the Dollhouse. Most of the time, she ambles around the Dollhouse’s lush confines in yoga duds, a docile and childlike blank slate. When needed, her brain is stuffed with a custom-made personality built from bits and pieces of other people’s lives, and this new personality is dispatched to perform a mission, whether it’s as simple as a weekend date or as complex as a life-or-death hostage negotiation.

Before she was Echo, the pilot hints that she was Caroline, a young woman in a lot of trouble, who may have been coerced into a five-year stint as a living doll to escape whatever went wrong in her life. The fun begins when bits of Echo’s memories begin bleeding unexpectedly into the false personalities with which she’s implanted. Either Caroline’s still in there, trying to get to the surface — or Echo’s beginning to manifest a soul of her own.

I’ve never been a card-carrying member of Dushku’s fan club — when it comes to sighing heavily over members of the Buffy cast, I was always more of an Allyson Hannigan guy — but her work in “Dollhouse” is hands down the best I’ve seen from her. In the pilot, she’s Eleanor Penn, an icy negotiator whose buttoned-down demeanor can’t quite hold together a broken jumble of seriously bad childhood damage. And when things go bad for Eleanor, Dushku really steps up to bat, delivering a moving and compelling performance.

Not surprisingly for a Whedon production, the rest of the cast pretty much buries the needle on the awesomeness scale. The likes of Olivia Williams, Harry Lennix, Tamoh Pennikett, Reed Diamond, and Amy Acker (for whom my enthusiasm has been abundantly documented) give Whedon a phenomenally deep bench of talent. They don’t get a lot to do in the pilot, but they’re very good at fleshing out the hints of complexity their characters possess. New faces in the cast include the striking, almost unnaturally good-looking Dichen Lachmann, as a fellow Active named Sierra, and Fran Kranz, as the glibly amoral techie responsible for the Actives’ programming. Whedon loves to reflect his nerdy fanbase (yours truly admittedly included) in ugly, unnerving mirrors, and Kranz’s compellingly creepy Topher is no exception.

The result is something good, but not great. I suspect the original pilot the network gave a thumbs-down was far better and smarter, but unlike his equally hasty do-over for Firefly, Whedon manages to make this second take work reasonably well. Also, despite a few flashes of wit, “Dollhouse” is not yet as funny or daring as Whedon’s previous work. And you know what? I’m OK with that.

I love Firefly now, but when it first aired, the first few episodes Fox deigned to broadcast were honestly just OK. Firefly, like Buffy and especially Angel, took a little while to hit its stride — and when it did, it became face-rockingly excellent with almost frightening speed. Given a writing staff well-stocked with such talented Whedon pals as Jane Espenson and Tim Minear, I have no doubts that Dollhouse will do equally well once it finds its footing. In the meantime, it’s smart, fun, entertaining TV, easily as watchable as any of my favorite classy cable dramas.

I hope Fox keeps its promise to give the show a full 13-episode season to build an audience. Really, you’d think the network suits would have learned by now: Joss Whedon - creative tampering + time to grow a following = lurid, obscene bales of money from DVD sales.

If Tom Shales doesn’t want to stick around for the fun, well, I suspect that’ll be his loss.
Top
Darris
Posted: Feb 18 2009, 12:43 AM


Given blood lately?
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Member No.: 56
Joined: 1-September 04



Just watched the first episode. It was ok, I didn't know what to expect really, obviously I will be watching a few more episodes before I decide on if I like or or not. I quite like the premise though, I was surpised to see a girl who was in Neighbours in it, in fact I had to look at the cast list on imdb as I couldn't place where I had seen her face before.
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 18 2009, 09:26 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



ponder.gif good start but not perfect

it seem joss is trying to do a grown up tv show: more serious, less pop reference/joke/.... during dark scenes (or is it because it's fox's episode eermm.gif )

really like the first scene between caroline (hope we gonna learn a bit more about her past and whatever she did) and adelle even there was a bit of "down faith" feeling in her reaction

good scene of echo when she get her panic attack at the kidnapper sight (wrong download or too good download unsure.gif )

some interesting personalities and dolls (Sierra) in the dollhouse, i suppose we gonna learn how they end up there sooner or later and if really the 5 years contract is really of 5 years as boyd seems to doubt it (make you wonder how long he and topher have been working in the office)

not sure about the usual FBI agent investigating what's going on eermm.gif

the last scenes were intriguing ponder.gif

let see episode two
Top
Darris
Posted: Feb 18 2009, 11:56 PM


Given blood lately?
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Member No.: 56
Joined: 1-September 04



QUOTE (buffy_fan1 @ Feb 14 2009, 09:19 PM)
It’s always good to see Amy Acker but after there was so much talk about her make up but I didn’t notice the “scars” that much to be honest.


I didn't realise there was actual threads for the episodes when I came here last night.

I didn't notice Amy Ackers scars either, and had it not been mentioned in here I probably wouldn't have noticed in further episodes.

However I has seen a picture of her in character and they are clearly visable.

http://www.critictoo.com/wp-content/upload...r-dollhouse.jpg
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 19 2009, 09:47 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



i had read about amy acker's character and about the scars but until Echo asked about them, i didn't notice anything eermm.gif rolleyes.gif

Top
little pixie
Posted: Feb 19 2009, 01:00 PM


Pink Mousey - Live the Dream
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 26,786
Member No.: 141
Joined: 20-February 05



QUOTE (Darris @ Feb 18 2009, 11:56 PM)
QUOTE (buffy_fan1 @ Feb 14 2009, 09:19 PM)
It’s always good to see Amy Acker but after there was so much talk about her make up but I didn’t notice the “scars” that much to be honest.


I didn't realise there was actual threads for the episodes when I came here last night.


I only put the forum up the day the ep aired in the US; it`s proved more popular than I`d thought. thumbsupsmileyanim.gif

Viv, I`ve moved your ep comments into this thread. biggrin.gif
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 20 2009, 11:04 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



QUOTE

"Dollhouse"  - 1x01 "Ghost" - Ew.com Review


Question: To celebrate the premiere of Dollhouse, I think it would be very fitting for you to give us some scoop — or at the very least tell us what you thought. — Sydney

Ausiello: I have mixed feelings about Dollhouse. My biggest complaint is the complete and utter lack of humor. Where’s the Whedonesque ha-ha we’ve all come to depend on? And when I am laughing, I don’t think I’m supposed to be. For instance, Eliza Dushku as a ball-busting hostage negotiator? Highlarious. And I may be in the minority here, but I find the Topher "I’m the lovable, quirky one" Brink character to be unbearable. The only thing I find relatable about him is his taste in sweater vests. Despite all this, I’m four episodes in and I can’t wait for No. 5. Go figure.
Top
prophecy girl
Posted: Feb 25 2009, 11:03 AM


Sr. Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 40,288
Member No.: 118
Joined: 5-February 05



QUOTE
"Dollhouse" Tv Series - Pajiba.com Review


I don’t like butting heads with the Whedonites. They’re good people — a little myopic, perhaps, and occasionally humorless. But good people. So, I decided to watch at least two “Dollhouse” episodes before offering a verdict, hoping to avoid some potential ugliness. In fact, I watched the pilot episode twice, hoping that I’d somehow missed something the first time around — something that would endear me to the show, something that had the underpinnings of a cool mythology, or at least something that distracted me from how godawful Eliza Dushku’s actressin’ is. The second viewing, unfortunately, only hardened my dislike. It was better, if only by a little, but it also validated Fox’s decision to move “Dollhouse” to the Friday night wasteland. “Dollhouse” probably won’t make it to a second season, but it’s not because of Fox, and it’s not because of the bad time slot. It’s because it’s not a very good show.

The premise: Eliza Dushku plays Echo, one of several personality vessels in the Dollhouse. She is programmed to be whoever the client wants her to be, and after each mission/adventure, Echo’s memory is wiped clean, until the next episode, when she’ll be reprogrammed for another client. Essentially, she’s a very high paid call girl/mission operative controlled by a mysteriously sinister corporate organization. In the first episode, she’s programmed to be someone’s dream date, and then as a hostage negotiator, secured by a wealthy businessman whose daughter was kidnapped.

Meanwhile, there’s also a government agent (Tahmoh Penkiett) of some sort who is trying to uncover the secret Dollhouse, though his motivations — which seem well-intentioned — aren’t exactly clear. Meanwhile, the show’s mythology, shades of Jason Bourne, revolves around why Echo decided to give up her civilian life and become one of the Dolls, which is being revealed slowly through a scant few flashbacks, since Echo has no trace of her former personality left. Also, it appears that someone — either from her civilian life, or a former Doll who went HAL — is trying to kill or save her. Echo’s only real ally, so far, is stoic stock black character (Harry Lennix), who is channeling the vibe of “Alias’” Carl Lumbly. All the while, Echo also seems to be recovering, albeit slowly, some of her past memories, full recovery of which would make this show even more pointless than it already is.

So far, anyway, “Dollhouse” feels similar to the less than mediocre and cancelled Christian Slater show, “My Own Worst Enemy,” only “Dollhouse” is even less compelling, as Echo has no home life to conflict with her prostitution work. When she’s not programmed for one of her clients, she’s vacant — she walks ethereally around the Dollhouse offices with a bored, oblivious expression. In other words: She’s Eliza Dushku, the dimpled female version of Keanu Reeves. Dushku (who is also a producer) is the show’s weakest element — she can barely act, and while you’d think her robotic nature would work well in the context of the premise, it’s hard to tell the difference between when Echo is the listless vessel or when a programmed personality is inhabiting her. Even her “personalities” have no personality. She looks pretty, but the pebble rattling around in her head must have knocked out the light.

Dushku is not, however, the show’s only problem. The entire cast is wooden and flat. In part, it’s because the characters are supposed to be sterile corporate types or government agents, but there’s more to it than that. There is nothing about anyone on the show that might give you any reason to care about them. “Dollhouse,” like its residents, is empty. The dialogue is clunky, and the mythology is shallow. Whedon may have been better served, in fact, to fully reveal Echo’s human side at the outset, so at least there’d be something familiarly human the viewer could cling to.

Indeed, it feels as though Whedon — who has been burned too often by the lack of commercial appeal in his shows — is overshooting now. He’s trying to create a J.J. Abrams mythology and merge it with the preposterous action elements of “24.” What Whedon’s forgetting, however, is his greatest strength: Character development. There are no Captain Reynolds in “Dollhouse” or a Jayne Cobb or Captain Hammer or a Willow. The show has zero humor, and nothing in it resonates either cerebrally or emotionally. The show is inert, catatonic. It’s a program that deserves to be on Friday nights, where maybe it can skate by unnoticed long enough for Joss Whedon to flesh it out and turn it around.

He might want to start by getting rid of Eliza Dushku.
Top
BouncyCastle
Posted: Feb 25 2009, 12:58 PM


Sr. Member
*

Group: Guests
Posts: 3,073
Member No.: 266
Joined: 17-January 07



Bloody hell. That's harsh. ninja.gif
Top
willowroolz
Posted: Feb 25 2009, 01:12 PM


A Lerxst in wonderland
Group Icon

Group: Special Member
Posts: 23,334
Member No.: 9
Joined: 27-April 04



Harsh but not completely wrong on the evidence thus far. The last two (full) paragraphs are pretty much spot on, imo.
Top
buffy_fan1
Posted: Feb 25 2009, 08:25 PM


I'm Under Her Spell!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 9,173
Member No.: 102
Joined: 27-January 05



QUOTE (BouncyCastle @ Feb 25 2009, 12:58 PM)
Bloody hell.  That's harsh.  ninja.gif

ohmy.gif mad.gif I agree those comments are far too harsh and imo totally wrong! If Dollhouse was beng made by someone else other Joss they'd be saying what an original and intesting idea. Instead the people lining up to stick the boot in and are trying to get Dollhouse cancelled before it's even got started! sad.gif
Top
TV Yank
Posted: Feb 25 2009, 09:00 PM


Tiffany of Girls' Generation
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,058
Member No.: 15
Joined: 8-May 04



In matters of taste, it's often difficult to put a finger on what we find likable and the opposite. Especially, if the overall effect of the show on us is slightly off.

There are things that bother me about DOLLHOUSE -- much as FIREFLY bothered me. Trying to sort out why is a major spelunking effort. Is it the premise? The storylines? The characters? The actors? The dialog? The philosophy?

I think that's why the critics have varied so widely on this show -- except in their negativity.

Dushku is an easy target. She was never an actress with depth or versatility. But she wasn't a bad actress either. And, while I see a slight improvement in her work, others still see the actress as falling short cuz they didn't bother to look more closely. A way of sorting this out is to try to imagine if this show would work better with a different actress? My opinion: a better actress might lift the show a little -- but the problem for me is elsewhere.

One thing is clear: this show is not a Whedon milestone. And, like FIREFLY, it may go down becuz the non-Whedon-shippers (and they are the vast majority of viewers) aren't interested in investing time in something that started out so unpromisingly.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Dollhouse | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Sign-up Now

Pages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.3860 seconds | Archive

Mark all posts as read

Linkage