Background images for your banners
| · Portal |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) |    |
Background images for your banners| kinaihiri |
Posted: Jul 7 2007, 09:39 PM
|
 Member  Group: Members Posts: 8 Member No.: 8 Joined: 2-July 07  |
I've used CS3, I beg to differ.
|
    
|
| farhanbash |
Posted: May 22 2008, 12:20 PM
|
 Member Group: Members Posts: 8 Member No.: 16 Joined: 22-May 08 |
CS3 is not a total crap infact its better than all other versions, Reason i am using CS2 is because. It does'nt have Imageready, they have integrate all of its features in CS3 which totally sucks for me
 |
|
|
| RageXavier |
Posted: May 22 2008, 11:19 PM
|
 Member Group: Members Posts: 19 Member No.: 4 Joined: 16-June 07 |
CS3 seems to be just a re-arraignment of photoshop palettes and brushes. with Cs2 you have the same capabilities, although Cs3 requires more RAM than Cs2 does. Overall, I would give CS3 much as the dudes could have done more to improve photoshop. They just messed with the interface abit
|
|
|
| farhanbash |
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 04:07 PM
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 8 Member No.: 16 Joined: 22-May 08 |
i think CS3's interface is pretty good and i love it. I luv using CS3 for making or editing stuff but they have integrated Imageready in it so i am having a hard time making Gifs lol. So this i why i am using CS2 because of Imageready.
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
|
Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.4273 seconds | Archive
Page creation time: 0.4273 seconds | Archive